Accessibility tools

We have installed ReadSpeaker’s webReader, which allows visitors to instantly convert online content to audio on our website.

Click on the icon above to try this out, and take advantage of the full range of useful webReader features by clicking the link below.

Readspeaker website

Accessibility statement

This accessibility statement applies to www.audit.wales. This website is run by Audit Wales. We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website.

View accessibility statement

Reporting accessibility problems

We’re always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, contact:

info@audit.wales

GP practice patient lists in good health overall

15 January 2026
  • No immediate evidence of potential fraud, but a small number of errors identified

    Our work focused on duplicate patient registrations or deceased individuals not removed from patient lists on a timely basis. 

    We engaged with NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership (NWSSP) to carry out a data matching pilot exercise on General Practitioner (GP) practice patient lists. Our main aim was to detect any evidence of potential fraud and/or error. However, we also wanted to identify ways in which NHS Wales might need to improve its own processes around GP patient lists.

    The way GP practices are paid is complex, but the number of patients registered at a practice is at the heart of it. This payment mechanism has an inherent fraud risk. Appropriate checks and balances on the accuracy of GP patient lists can help manage this risk.

    As well as ensuring GP practices receive the correct funding, accurate patient lists support the wider management of primary care. They also help ensure the NHS provides timely access for services such as screening; preventing issues like patients who should not be registered blocking appointment invitations.

    We did not identify any immediate evidence of potential fraud in the areas covered by our work. We did, however, find a small number of errors. More specifically: 

    • We identified a relatively small number of duplicate patient registrations; 140 to date but with 395 potential matches still under investigation.
    •  Only a very small number of deceased individuals – 15 – remained on GP patient lists, but some had been left on those lists for a long time. 
    • The duplicate and deceased patient records identified mean that GP funding has been allocated inaccurately, but the sum involved is low. 

    Our results suggest patient list inflation controls in the areas covered by the exercise are generally sound. Nevertheless, NWSSP is working to enhance its overall central controls. There have also been recent wider IT system changes that cover England, Wales, and the Isle of Man.

    ,
    Data matching and other data analytic techniques are increasingly important as public bodies tackle risks around fraud and error. The results from this exercise have not identified significant concerns about the accuracy of GP patient lists and that is a good thing. But there is no room for complacency. I therefore welcome the way in which NWSSP has taken forward learning from this exercise as part of wider improvements it has already made. Adrian Crompton, Auditor General
    ,

    Related Report

    Checking the patients. Results from a pilot data matching exercise on GP patient lists

    View more